HCL Domino Ideas Portal
Welcome to the #dominoforever Product Ideas Forum! The place where you can submit product ideas and enhancement request. We encourage you to participate by voting on, commenting on, and creating new ideas. All new ideas will be evaluated by HCL Product Management & Engineering teams, and the next steps will be communicated. While not all submitted ideas will be executed upon, community feedback will play a key role in influencing which ideas are and when they will be implemented.
For more information and upcoming events around #dominoforever, please visit our Destination Domino Page
its a pitty you think this way. In most smaller environments, i agree it probably isnt a problem. Even putting more power behind. But in enterprise environments, these operations effect different servers on the frame(s). The question i was leaving behind, is to let you guys think on improving. We have aprx. 20 Million calendar appointments, most of them very old. Cleaning is up to the users, most of them dont care or dont know. Do we need to change all the old documents, just sitting in the mailfile, never to be touched again, except for the server in case of name changes. Is it a problem when a user cannot edit a 5 year (non-repeating) old calendar document anymore ? Because adminp has an option to skip 3, 4 , or 5 year old calendar documents ? think about the advantage ; every appointment has multiple documents, and in everyones mailfile, these documents must be changed, for every user. I feel this is very non-efficient....