#dominoforever | Product Ideas Portal

 

Welcome to the #dominoforever Product Ideas Forum! The place where you can submit product ideas and enhancement request. We encourage you to participate by voting on, commenting on, and creating new ideas. All new ideas will be evaluated by HCL Product Management & Engineering teams, and the next steps will be communicated. While not all submitted ideas will be executed upon, community feedback will play a key role in influencing which ideas are and when they will be implemented.

For more information and upcoming events around #dominoforever, please visit our Destination Domino Page

Both per client base license or per apps base license

Both license type is good, depend on an organization need.

  • Guest
  • May 29 2020
  • Unlikely to implement
  • Attach files
  • Guest commented
    1 Jun, 2020 06:17pm

    I'm already looking forward to the next version with the possibility to use apps even with non-authenticated users.

    I think, depending on the organization and the use case, licensing per server, per domain or per app could best fit the needs.

    If HCL wants apps being used on organisations' public web site (e.g. for the recruiting process), they have to offer the licensing for this use case. A per server license would be easier for all (HCL and customer) then per core or per PVU.

    The case for the per app licensing would be - like the XWorks Server (R.i.P.) - if there are only one or at least not many apps for the public. This would lower the entry barrier for this use case.