Welcome to the #dominoforever Product Ideas Forum! The place where you can submit product ideas and enhancement request. We encourage you to participate by voting on, commenting on, and creating new ideas. All new ideas will be evaluated by HCL Product Management & Engineering teams, and the next steps will be communicated. While not all submitted ideas will be executed upon, community feedback will play a key role in influencing which ideas are and when they will be implemented.
For more information and upcoming events around #dominoforever, please visit our Destination Domino Page
If this is going to be done please put some context around best practices. E.g. the often quoted...
'Dont' have too many large sortable views' - what is too many, 10, 100, 1000?
Don't use too many hidden fields - what is too many 10, 100, etc ....
etc etc.
Hallo Thomas!
Habe ich doch schon l����nngst f�r gevoted ;-) Hatte Ben ja in seinem Blog
schon drauf hingewiesen.
Mit freundlichen Gr��en
Christian
Though it is off topic for this idea, I do want to point out that using tags rather than folders would likely be a far more major change than increasing the limit on the folder names. (I'll leave to a separate discussion the pros and cons of folders vs. tags.)
What is especially vague is the limit on the number of folders in a mail file, or rather, the limit on the total length of all the folder names in the folder tree. What bugs most people is the erratic behavior of the mail template when this limit is exceeded. Why not forget about folders and introduce tags (like in Gmail.... I know, blasphemy...)