Skip to Main Content
HCL Domino Ideas Portal

Welcome to the #dominoforever Product Ideas Forum! The place where you can submit product ideas and enhancement request. We encourage you to participate by voting on, commenting on, and creating new ideas. All new ideas will be evaluated by HCL Product Management & Engineering teams, and the next steps will be communicated. While not all submitted ideas will be executed upon, community feedback will play a key role in influencing which ideas are and when they will be implemented.

For more information and upcoming events around #dominoforever, please visit our Destination Domino Page

Status Needs Review
Workspace Domino Designer
Categories LotusScript
Created by Guest
Created on May 11, 2021

Extend NotesRegistration class to allow selection of PAB/Directory database for created users. (Support CCX / Guest model)

The new CCX / Guest user license model mandates that users are registered in a secondary NAB / Domino directory.

This is easily achieved if we just create person documents but it is not sufficient if we look to entitle those CCX / Guest users for the best options of the new license model (entitlement for Nomad / nomad Web).

In order to support "Notes ID" based applications we need to be able to perform a real registration / maintenance of users.

Today the NotesRegistration (see ) has nothing that allows selection of the NAB where we want to store registered users.

We would like to be able to set the NAB / Server name for the registration so that:

  1. Person documents are created in the right place

  2. Notes IDs are created and stored in vaults accordingly to policies

  3. Public key for the Notes ID is stored and maintained in the right person document in the secondary NAB used for CCX/Guest users

This would be a perfect addition for Domino 12.0.1 (or even an intermediate fixpack)

Today we have "RegistrationServer" property. We would like to have an additional "RegistrationAddressBook" option to set the target NAB

[Daniele Vistalli / Factor-y S.r.l.]

  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Aug 8, 2023

    thanks for the clarification. The request makes sense IMHO regardless of this. Now that IDVault is the way to go (and maybe CA Process too). I think that creating uses in ‘non primary’ address book gets even more complicated. Otherwise we will continue to work with hacks when we need/want to segregate users.

    Maybe lower priority but still makes sense IMHO

  • Admin
    Thomas Hampel
    Aug 8, 2023

    the CCX/Guest model does not mandate to register users in a secondary NAB. It is just a rather common approach customers have used in the past where e.g. self registrations are put into a secondary directory. You dont have to do that.