HCL Domino Ideas Portal

Welcome to the #dominoforever Product Ideas Forum! The place where you can submit product ideas and enhancement request. We encourage you to participate by voting on, commenting on, and creating new ideas. All new ideas will be evaluated by HCL Product Management & Engineering teams, and the next steps will be communicated. While not all submitted ideas will be executed upon, community feedback will play a key role in influencing which ideas are and when they will be implemented.

For more information and upcoming events around #dominoforever, please visit our Destination Domino Page

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Shipped
Workspace Domino
Categories Security
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 26, 2021

RELATED IDEAS

V12 certmgr: When using DNS-01 with the command, the add and delete have the same status.

In the DNS provider configuration document, if you are using "Command" in [Type:] field, the response from the command should come back in JSON.

The STATUS value of that JSON can be used in [Status formula].

However, since the same foumula is used in both "add command" and delete command" formula, it is not possible to separate the process for add command and delete command.

We would like to have different statuses for add and delete command.


  • Attach files
  • Admin
    Thomas Hampel
    Reply
    |     Mar 9, 2023

    Fixed in Domino 12.0.1

  • Admin
    Thomas Hampel
    Reply
    |     Mar 9, 2023

    reference SPR #STAAC5462H

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Feb 7, 2022

    The status is the same for DNS add and DNS delete, regardless of the command request.

    I would like to see a separate status field for DNS add and DNS delete.

    Or, there should be a status variable to distinguish between DNS add and DNS delete status.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Jul 26, 2021

    It's not the formula which is the challenge here.

    The same status field is used for both command scripts.

    We have to check details about the implementation. Certainly changing the status to be separate like for HTTP requests makes most sense.

    What issues are you running into currently with this limitation?

    I can help with a work-around?

    Which type of provider are you trying to implement and why do you use the command interface?

    The command interface is not the recommended interface and should be only used in special cases, when HTTP requests can't be used for integration.


    Daniel Nashed

Copyright © 2023 HCL Technologies Limited