Welcome to the #dominoforever Product Ideas Forum! The place where you can submit product ideas and enhancement request. We encourage you to participate by voting on, commenting on, and creating new ideas. All new ideas will be evaluated by HCL Product Management & Engineering teams, and the next steps will be communicated. While not all submitted ideas will be executed upon, community feedback will play a key role in influencing which ideas are and when they will be implemented.
For more information and upcoming events around #dominoforever, please visit our Destination Domino Page
Actually it looks like also the main idea has 633 upvotes and is DOMINO-I-173 . So there are at least 3 very similar ideas floating around that should be consolidated and have the votes totaled please.
This idea seems similar to idea DOMINO-I-1096 which I just posted to. I think these ideas should be merged so there is just one of this nature. If that happens, please keep the total number of votes since I believe this is a very important topic.
@Thomas Hampel: yes, there is a coincidence.
Extra license costs asise by using fake test ids on non-productive development and test servers.
The CCB License model accounts for the number of users, so you can install any number of servers you want. Incl. test or development servers at no extra cost.
I guess what you are proposing is this => https://domino-ideas.hcltechsw.com/ideas/DOMINO-I-173
Yep, development and test servers and build and removed quickly on demand.
Usually the real users have license anyway on their productive servers. But development servers need not existing test users, that will not fit the current license!
who's idea it was to remove community edition?