#dominoforever | Product Ideas Portal

 

Welcome to the #dominoforever Product Ideas Forum! The place where you can submit product ideas and enhancement request. We encourage you to participate by voting on, commenting on, and creating new ideas. All new ideas will be evaluated by HCL Product Management & Engineering teams, and the next steps will be communicated. While not all submitted ideas will be executed upon, community feedback will play a key role in influencing which ideas are and when they will be implemented.

For more information and upcoming events around #dominoforever, please visit our Destination Domino Page

FTSearch: remove certain fields from the index (per database customization)

FTSearch scans all the items on a note, even those items that are not visible to the end user. Users complain of false positives when they search for something, but get more results than expected because the values are not visible to the end user. Typical: I look for documents where I am an author, but receive all documents as a result because my name is in a hidden readers field. Potentially could reduce the size of the FTIndex and increase search speed.

  • Avatar32.5fb70cce7410889e661286fd7f1897de Guest
  • Jul 17 2018
  • Likely to implement
  • Attach files
  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    16 Jun 02:20pm

    There should be an area in a forms designer properties box to define the field of "that form" which should not be fulltext indexed.

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    5 Jun 08:58am

    I agree that this solution will help many developers solve their project tasks.

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    4 Jun 11:34am

    This idea is great. Our developers will be very useful this development of the server.

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    3 Jun 02:40pm

    The refinement is wonderful. When will the implementation be?

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    2 Jun 01:25pm

    I wanted to say that there were more such ideas, like this, and the functionality will become even better.

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    1 Jun 12:54pm

    Our customers are looking forward to when we can use this revision in our system.

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    29 May 01:13pm

    The idea is wonderful and very useful to us in practice.

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    28 May 01:45pm

    When will this revision be implemented?

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    27 May 07:48am

    Our developers really need this revision of your functionality.

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    26 May 12:00pm

    I agree and fully support this revision.

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    25 May 02:40pm

    The idea is great. We are very useful for development.

  • Admin
    Thomas Hampel commented
    27 Oct, 2018 08:13am

    Moving idea to product : Domino Designer

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    19 Jul, 2018 10:15am

    Seconded. An opt-out of FT index would save loads of aggro.

    Re some fields being visible to some people: Just leave them in !

    But some fields like $updatedby and unique key  fields .. depending on the design, you might never want them to be indexed

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    17 Jul, 2018 11:41am

    Good idea, but what with fields that are visible to some users, and not to others?